Comments on: Book Review : Internet Cool Tools for Physicians http://nextbio.wordpress.com/2009/08/27/book-review-internet-cool-tools-for-physicians/ Sun, 30 Aug 2009 20:43:12 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: Headline Commentary Aug 24-30 | Health Content Advisors http://nextbio.wordpress.com/2009/08/27/book-review-internet-cool-tools-for-physicians/#comment-557 Headline Commentary Aug 24-30 | Health Content Advisors Sun, 30 Aug 2009 20:43:12 +0000 http://blog.nextbio.com/?p=609#comment-557 [...] » Book Review : Internet Cool Tools for Physicians « Nextbio’s Blog [...] [...] » Book Review : Internet Cool Tools for Physicians « Nextbio’s Blog [...]

]]> By: Lisa Ede http://nextbio.wordpress.com/2009/08/27/book-review-internet-cool-tools-for-physicians/#comment-549 Lisa Ede Fri, 28 Aug 2009 16:57:22 +0000 http://blog.nextbio.com/?p=609#comment-549 You have such a wonderful style, Hope! Your personality comes through and your ethos is strong, you're witty at times, and yet you're also quite clear and compelling in your analysis. Excellent work! Just FYI I'm still swamped and getting ready for a 10AM call with my editor. You have such a wonderful style, Hope! Your personality comes through and your ethos is strong, you’re witty at times, and yet you’re also quite clear and compelling in your analysis. Excellent work!

Just FYI I’m still swamped and getting ready for a 10AM call with my editor.

]]> By: Hope Leman http://nextbio.wordpress.com/2009/08/27/book-review-internet-cool-tools-for-physicians/#comment-548 Hope Leman Fri, 28 Aug 2009 15:57:47 +0000 http://blog.nextbio.com/?p=609#comment-548 Mothers are another matter... Mothers are another matter…

]]> By: Nancy F. Leman http://nextbio.wordpress.com/2009/08/27/book-review-internet-cool-tools-for-physicians/#comment-546 Nancy F. Leman Fri, 28 Aug 2009 07:06:59 +0000 http://blog.nextbio.com/?p=609#comment-546 Just to let you know I read your review, too. Good job. You left the final "f" off the off in the third line. You can't escape the ultimate proofreader just because you're in the elevated atmosphere of the BLOG. (Just kidding!) Sounds like a good book. NFL Just to let you know I read your review, too. Good job. You left the final “f” off the off in the third line. You can’t escape the ultimate proofreader just because you’re in the elevated atmosphere of the BLOG. (Just kidding!)

Sounds like a good book. NFL

]]> By: Hope Leman http://nextbio.wordpress.com/2009/08/27/book-review-internet-cool-tools-for-physicians/#comment-545 Hope Leman Fri, 28 Aug 2009 05:19:02 +0000 http://blog.nextbio.com/?p=609#comment-545 Fathers--gotta love 'em. Fathers–gotta love ‘em.

]]> By: craig b. leman http://nextbio.wordpress.com/2009/08/27/book-review-internet-cool-tools-for-physicians/#comment-544 craig b. leman Thu, 27 Aug 2009 23:49:42 +0000 http://blog.nextbio.com/?p=609#comment-544 Good review in every way. Thanks. CBL Good review in every way. Thanks. CBL

]]> By: Hope Leman http://nextbio.wordpress.com/2009/08/27/book-review-internet-cool-tools-for-physicians/#comment-543 Hope Leman Thu, 27 Aug 2009 22:09:16 +0000 http://blog.nextbio.com/?p=609#comment-543 Hi, Melissa. Yeah, indexes are a hassle. My favorite story about indexes concerned one for a book about Irish land law under British rule. "Landlords, iniquities of" followed by "Landlords, further iniquities of..." Great job on the book—you have set the standard. Hope Hi, Melissa. Yeah, indexes are a hassle. My favorite story about indexes concerned one for a book about Irish land law under British rule. “Landlords, iniquities of” followed by “Landlords, further iniquities of…”

Great job on the book—you have set the standard.

Hope

]]> By: Melissa http://nextbio.wordpress.com/2009/08/27/book-review-internet-cool-tools-for-physicians/#comment-542 Melissa Thu, 27 Aug 2009 21:37:08 +0000 http://blog.nextbio.com/?p=609#comment-542 Nah, the index was our fault. They wanted us to compile it ourselves, and I said no way. But Twitter wasn't really on the radar in 2007 when the book was outlined. It was too novel to write about. Anyway, thanks for the nice review. Nah, the index was our fault. They wanted us to compile it ourselves, and I said no way. But Twitter wasn’t really on the radar in 2007 when the book was outlined. It was too novel to write about. Anyway, thanks for the nice review.

]]>